Skip to main content

Welcome, the Hub connects all projects


Science Education


"The notion of controversy in the science classroom might bring to mind debates about the teaching of evolution and or about mandatory testing under No Child Left Behind. But focusing on such high-profile concerns misses larger tensions that have characterized science education in the U.S. over the past century. Taking a long view of science education reveals the competing approaches to what and how students should learn in science that have shaped today's K-12 science landscape.

George DeBoer, Project 2061's deputy director, provides that long view in his article "Science Education" for a new book, "Battleground: Schools," available from Greenwood Press. DeBoer's look at science education traces how traditional and progressive ideals have competed with each other in science education. The two approaches have shaped debates over "child-centered vs. teacher-centered teaching; disciplinary knowledge vs. societal applications; and discovery vs. reception learning" (DeBoer, 2007). DeBoer covers four key periods in the history of science education: (1) the progressive era of the first half of the twentieth century; (2) the age of reform in the 1950s and 1960s, characterized by an intellectual treatment of the scientific disciplines; (3) the shift in the 1970s away from disciplinary study and toward social relevance in the form of science literacy; and (4) the past two decades focusing on goal statements in science education through documents such as Project 2061's Science for All Americans (AAAS, 1989) and the National Research Council's National Science Education Standards (NRC, 1996)."