 D. Huinker
|
Measuring Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching: Measurement and Modeling Issues in Constructing and Using Teacher Assessments Huinker, Sass and Walker (MSP: Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership: Sharing in Leadership for Student Success)
|
|
The Veritable Quandary of Measuring Teacher Content Knowledge Basile, Koellner, Kimbrough, Jacobson, Morris, Heath, and Lakshmanan (MSP: Rocky Mountain Middle School Mathematics and Science Partnership: 15 Months to Highly Qualified) |
 I. Weiss
|
Deepening Teacher Content Knowledge for Teaching: A Review of the Evidence
Weiss and Miller (RETA: Knowledge Management and Dissemination for the MSPs, Horizon Research)
|
  J. Smithson & R. Blank
|
Indicators of Quality of Teacher Professional Development and Instructional Change Using Data from Surveys of Enacted Curriculum: Findings from NSF MSP-RETA Project
Smithson and Blank (RETA: Longitudinal Design to Measure Effects of MSP Professional Development in Improving Quality of Instruction in Mathematics and Science Education, CCSSO) |
 J. Monsaas
|
Engaging Higher Education Faculty in K-16 Learning Communities to Improve Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics in the K-12 Schools Monsaas (MSP: Partnership for Reform in Science and Mathematics (PRISM), Georgia)
|
 S. Olitsky
|
Increasing Teacher Content Knowledge through STEM Faculty Involvement
Olitsky (MSP: The Mathematics and Science Partnership of Greater Philadelphia, MSPGP) |
|
Focused Mathematics Professional Development Results in Student Achievement Gains
Lamm and Sloan (MSP: Alliance for Improvement of Mathematics Skills in PreK-16, Texas) |
|
VMP Evaluation Findings Related to Changes in Teaching Practice, Drawn from Qualitative Focus Group Data Nolte and Harris (MSP: Vermont Mathematics Partnership)
|
 B. Saylor
|
Using Data to Guide Mathematics Reform within a K-12 District
Saylor and Apaza (MSP: PRIME: Promoting Reflective Inquiry in Mathematics Education, South Dakota) |
 
X. Zhang & J. McInerney
|
Exploration of the Process and Impact of STEM Faculty Involvement
Zhang and McInerney (RETA: The Effect of STEM Faculty Engagement in MSP: A Longitudinal Perspective, Westat)
|
D. May |
Networking Among VIP Participants: Innovative Survey Research on New Collaborative Relationships
Parsad, Frechtling, Shapiro, and May (MSP: Vertically Integrated Partnerships K-16, VIP K-16, Maryland) |

J. Steele & V. Williams |
Professional Development Participation and the Role of Administrator Involvement in the MSP of Southwest Pennsylvania
Steele, Pane, Williams, and Olmsted (MSP: MSP of Southwest Pennsylvania) |
 J. Arce
|
Teachers’ and Students’ Learning With Understanding in Science and Mathematics: Methods and Results from PRMSP/Alacima
Bravo and Arce (MSP: Puerto Rico Mathematics and Science Partnership)
|
R. Atwood
|
Pre-service Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of Standards-based Magnetism Concepts
Atwood and Christopher (MSP: Appalachian Mathematics and Science Partnership, Kentucky)
|
|
Evaluation of the Greater Birmingham Mathematics Partnership (GBMP): A Comprehensive Approach to Evaluating Changes in Teachers’ Mathematics Understanding
Cochran (MSP: A Greater Birmingham Partnership: Building Communities of Learners and Leaders in Middle School Mathematics, Alabama) |
 S. Millar
|
Magic or Mirrors? Questions about Partnership as a Construct Arising from Micro-Level Case Analysis Clifford, Millar, Tran and Hora (MSP: System-Wide Change for all Learners and Educators (SCALE), Wisconsin)
|
 C. Landel
|
Emerging Conceptions of Effective K-12-Higher Education Partnerships
Landel and Ohana (MSP: North Cascades and Olympic Science Partnership, Washington) |
 
C. Kutal & N. Vandergift
|
Developing a Reward Structure for Higher Education Faculty Involvement in K-12 Schools
Kutal, Butler, Connor, Ellett, Henry, Hessinger, Kettlewell, Kozaitis, Miller, Rich, Vandergrift, and Zinsmeister (MSP: Partnership for Reform in Science and Mathematics, Georgia)
|
 S. Benson
|
Report on Course and Curriculum Changes in Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Programs
Shapiro, Benson, Maloney, Frank, Dezfooli, Susskind, and Muñoz (MSP: Vertically Integrated Partnerships K-16, VIP K-16, Maryland): Change and Sustainability in Higher Education (CASHÉ) |
 
S. Meyer & J. Sutton
|
Linking Teacher Characteristics to Student Mathematics Outcomes: Preliminary Evidence of Impact on Teachers and Students after Participation in the First Year of the Math in the Middle Institute Partnership
Meyer and Sutton (Math in the Middle Institute Partnership, RMC Research) |
|
The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership: A Path Model for Evaluating Teacher and Student Effects
Hanssen (MSP: Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership: Sharing in Leadership for Student Success) |
T. Shanahan |
Continued Integration of Curriculum Guides, Quarterly Benchmark Assessments, and Professional Development to Improve Student Learning in Mathematics and Science
Shanahan, Mann, and Manrique (MSP: University of California, Irvine FOCUS) |
P. Odell |
The Use of Various Types of Evidence in MSP Evaluations: A Case Study.
Odell (MSP: Texas Middle and Secondary Math Project)
|
M. Ziolo-Royer |
Impact of a Hands On Science Outreach Program on Student Interest in Science
Peyrot and Ziolo-Royer (MSP: UMBC-BCPS STEM Project, Maryland) |
J. Altschuld |
Evaluating a Minority STEM Retention Project: Evaluation Issues in Working in a Consortium and Numbers Don’t Tell the Whole Story
Altschuld, White, and Lee (RETA: USU’s RETA Advisory Committee)
|
D. Huinker |
How Valid is Self-Report Survey Data Obtained from School District Personnel? Walker, Gosz and Huinker (MSP: Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership: Sharing in Leadership for Student Success)
|
R. Torres |
Evidence-Based Decision Making to Support Teacher Learning in the Mathematical ACTS MSP
Torres, Bocian, and Bryant (MSP: Mathematical Acts, California) |
|
Development and Use of a Science Lesson Plan Analysis Instrument for Evaluating Teacher Practice and Informing Program Instruction
Jacobs and Otieno (University of Pennsylvania Science Teacher Institute) |

R. Heaton & D. Hartman |
A Study of Middle Level Students’ Mathematical Understanding Using Alternative Assessments
Heaton and Hartman (Math in the Middle Institute Partnership, Nebraska) |
D. Weaver |
Assessing the Quality and Quantity of Student Discourse in Mathematics Classrooms: Year 1 Results
Weaver and Dick (Oregon Mathematics Leadership Institute) |